A couple of thoughts on the logical fallacies in monotheism and capitalism;

Logically a spiritual absolute would be the essence of sentience, from which we rise, rather than an ideal of wisdom and judgement, from which we fell. The fact we are aware, than the details of which are are aware. The consequence of conflating the ideal, which is aspirational, with the absolute, which is elemental, is the tendency to see one's ideals as universal, rather than unique. Thus the tendency of the various movements seeking to replace monotheism and its political expression, monarchy, to also see their ideals as absolute and the Other becomes a rebuke to one's own True God. Resulting in all against all.

The problem of capitalism is that as linear, goal oriented creatures in a cyclical, feedback driven reality, people see money as the signal to extract and store, while markets need it to circulate. Requiring ever more to be added and ever more metastatic methods of storing what has been extracted. Since money functions as a contract, with the asset backed by a debt, our national religion of money accumulation requires an economy of debt.

Not only starving the regular economy of money, to draw the saved money back into circulation, but having the government as debtor of last resort. The capital markets simply could not function, without the government siphoning up trillions in surplus investment. Given much of this gets spent blowing up foreign brown people and paying people who are not working, neither of which is a productive investment, it is a ponzi scheme.

The reality is that there isn't sufficent investment potential to save the amount necessary to make people feel secure, but we do save for many of the same reasons, so the concept of the public commons will have to be resurrected.

I did an essay, sketching out some of this;

https://medium.com/predict/peeling-the-paradigm-1ceab7e774b0