Hi Bud,

Good to see you on medium.

I posted an essay earlier in the year, predicting the Webb will find more evidence of an infinite universe;

https://medium.com/predict/the-webb-is-cast-72f2b8ab067d

One of my primary arguments against BBT is the core illogic of using the premise of spacetime to explain cosmic redshift. Given that if space were to relativistically expand(further issues with spacetime as physical basis of relativity, but..), then the speed of light would have to increase, in order to remain Constant.

The fact is that two metrics are being derived from the same intergalactic light and the speed is still being used as the denominator, or it would be a tired light theory.

The irony of which, is that as mathematism, it is horribly lousy math.

I discovered this morning that my posts on the thread at Triton Station don't go through and my wordpress account won't even connect, so I guess I'm banned from one more site. I did happen to save the post, which was a reply to Michael Porter's comment about storing theory;

"We are mobile organisms, so our experience of our situation consists of a sequence of perceptions, originating in the need to navigate. So our concept of time is as the point of the present, moving past to future.

The reality is that change turns future to past. Tomorrow becomes yesterday, because the earth turns.

There is no dimension of time, because the past is consumed by the present, to inform and drive it. Causality and conservation of energy. Cause BECOMES effect.

Energy is conserved, because it is the present, creating time, as well as temperature, pressure, color and sound. Time is frequency, events are amplitude.

So energy, as present, goes past to future, while the patterns generated go future to past.

Energy drives the wave, while the fluctuations rise and fall. No tiny strings necessary.

Consciousness also goes past to future, while the perceptions, emotions and thoughts giving it form and structure go future to past. Though it is our digestive, respiratory and circulatory systems processing the energy driving us on, feeding the flame, while the central nervous system sorts through the information precipitating out. So the thought process tends to focus on the patterns, rather than the dynamic underlaying them.

Given thought is inherently reductionist, seeking signals in the noise, its focus tends to be on the most concentrated points of distilled information, thus objects/atoms/particles/strings. So this search for the elements of nature tends to distill out the tiniest bits of stuff. Though it’s a bit like looking for the keys under the streetlight."

Safe to say, if I hadn't been banned prior to it, I would have been, subsequently.