I think one possible problem is how humans experience time.

As mobile organisms, with a sequential process of perception, as a function of navigation and a narrative based culture, we naturally think of time as the point of the present, moving past to future. General Relativity codifies this as measures of duration, correlating them with measures of distance to formulate spacetime. QM also assumes this linear progression of time.

The reality is that change turns future to past. Tomorrow becomes yesterday, because the earth turns. There is no literal "dimension" of time, because the past is consumed by the present, to inform and drive it, aka, causality and conservation of energy. Cause becomes effect.

So "energy" is "conserved," because it is the present and time emerges from its activity, similar to temperature, pressure, color, sound. Think frequencies and amplitudes.

Time is asymmetric because it is a measure of specific actions and they are inertial. The earth only turns one direction.

Thus to say something has a definite position assumes a dimensionless point in time, which is our assumption of the present, as a dimensionless point between past and future. Yet the physical process creating time is not static. A dimensionless point in time would be analogous to a shutter speed set at zero. Even a moving car doesn't have an exact location, or it wouldn't be moving.

Consider that as the energy is only present, it goes past to future, so the patterns generated go future to past. As consciousness goes past to future, while thoughts go future to past.

What drives a wave is the energy propelling it, yet what we sense are the effects of this, the fluctuations yielding frequency and amplitude. So any effort to measure and define what is happening is of the information being generated by the process.

Consequently the information we collect is necessarily a function of our measurements of this energy. The patterns, not the process.

Consider the implications if quanta are more like frequencies and amplitudes, than the actual energy? Long story.

As these physical organisms, we have the digestive, respiratory and cirulatory systems processing the energy driving us on, while the central nervous system sorts though the information precipitating out. So there is an intellectual assumption that everything is information, because that is what is perceived, no matter how much we focus and clarify. Yet as quantum mechanics shows, some underlaying process keeps slipping out of our grasp.

Having raised this issue enough, I've found it to be too conceptual and not mathematical enough to be considered, so I'm just offering it up as a thought, as your generation is tasked with sorting through all the multiworlds, strings, multiverses and other unicorns for some sense. Eventually the field will have to go back to the drawing board.

Remember that epicycles were brilliant math, as a model of our view of the cosmos, but that view is biased. Our maps are not the territory and only model a small fraction of it.