If you are just going to argue the details and outcomes, you've already lost.

Argue the narratives. For example, a spiritual absolute would be the essence of sentience, from which we rise, not an ideal of wisdom and judgement, from which we fell. That father figure lawgiver is a tool of social control. Telling people they are nothing, without the Big Guy.

Or that money is a social contract enabling society, not a commodity to mine from it. As an economic medium, it is, by definition, a public utility, like roads.

Its functionality is its fungibility, so we own it like we own the section of road we are using, or the air and water flowing through our bodies.

The difference between markets and capitalism is that markets need money to circulate, while capitalism treats it as a commodity to mine and manufacture. which means crearting debt to back it. Thus the necessity for public debt, to back private wealth.

The medium became the message, the tool became the god.

Much of the rest is detail. Don't get lost in the weeds. Go for the heart.