It does seem truth is that fuzzy ground between some objective reality and our inherently subjective views.

For instance, what is time? Is it the point of the present going past to future, that we experience as mobile organisms with a sequential process of perception, or is it activity and the resulting change turning future to past? As in tomorrow becomes yesterday, because the earth turns.

Both are necessarily "True."

An objective point of view would be an oxymoron. The very nature of descriptive models, maps, conceptual frames is that they cannot encompass everything, or it would be whiteout. The signal would be lost back in the noise.

Consequently what might be true from one point of view might not be quite as true from another. Different people can describe and map the same events and spaces differently and there is no objective frame that wouldn't require editing the subjectivity. A compromise, so to speak.

Some religions see themselves as the only truth, therefore all others are flawed. Their ideals as absolute. We are reaching the point this version of truth is showing its limits.

Math is also viewed as objective truth, but it should be noted that epicycles were brilliant math, as a model of our terrestrial view of the cosmos. Yet it was still a subjective frame.