Maybe all the jargon is intellectual entropy?

A high heat to light ratio.

I find a fair number of basic flaws built into modern physics.

For one, thing, if intergalactic space expands, why doesn't the speed of the light crossing it increase proportionally, in order to remain constant?

Instead, two metrics are being derived from the speed and spectrum of the same light. Given it is an expanding space and not tired light theory, speed is still the explicit denominator. The only metric used to calibrate this expansion.

One way light does redshift over distance, is as multi spectrum packets, as the higher frequencies dissipate faster, yet that would mean we are sampling a wave front and the quantification of light is an artifact of its detection and measurement.

Which goes back to the arguments surrounding the development of Quantum Theory, that the basis of reality is entirely what is measured.

One of the alternatives was a "loading," or "threshold" theory.

One of the basic problems remained an instinctive assumption of some objective frame. Yet frames are abstractions of reality, not the basis. Finite slices of an infinite reality. Knowing both the exact location and momentum of a moving car is contradictory.

No omniscient omniscience. A spiritual absolute would be the essence of sentience, from which we rise, not an ideal of wisdom and judgement, from which we fell. The light shining through the film, than the stories playing out on it.