The problem seems to be our obsession with objectivity in a subjective world. Perspective is contextual, but we've developed this cultural attachment to the ideal.

Consider that to culture, good and bad are some cosmic conflict between righteousness and evil, while in nature, it's the basic biological binary of beneficial and detrimental. That's because it's the function of culture to synchronize the community into one larger social organism, but then we abstract it out to all of reality.

Logically a spiritual absolute would be the essence of sentience, from which we rise, not an ideal of wisdom and judgement, from which we fell. Ideals are not absolutes and having a culture evolve around that assumption has made it very fractured, as any ideology must assert its universality, to gain the necessary cult following. Who wants to follow a religion that's "good enough for the moment?"

Yet the nature of reality is that without the ups and downs, it's a flatline.

Synchronization pulling everything in, is balanced by harmonization equalizing across the spectrum. Nodes and networks, organisms and ecosystems, particles and fields.

So wherever you come across one of those religions asserting to be the only truth, or anti religions asserting nothing is true, circle around.