Though the tools we use to interpret reality will conflict and it is also necessary to understand how and why.

For instance, an antelope running with the herd has to be one with the hive mind, or accidents will happen.

While some little critter in the bushes has to analyze every rustle of the leaves and flash in the peripheral vision, if it wants to survive. One is belief, the other is probabilties. Religion and science.

If we blindly follow our beliefs and those defining them are not entirely concerned with the larger picture, we can be lead astray. While those examining all the details might start building on assumptions that become beliefs, rsisting outside information, until it is unavoidable.

One idea ingrained into society is the assumption of good and bad as some cosmic duel, between the forces of righteousness and evil, but they are the basic biological binary of beneficial and detrimental. The 1/0 of sentience.

In order to function, any society needs some basic set of ground rules, but if we assume good to be aspirational, rather than elemental, conflicts become unresolvable, as all nuance and subjectivity is lost to this black and white filter.

We are all nodes in the larger network and the spiritual absolute would be the essence of sentience, from which we rise, not an ideal of wisdom and judgement, from which we fell.

More the yin and yang of desire and judgement, the heart and the head, than any one true path.

Not all desires are healthy, nor all decisions wise. Trial and error. Without all the confusion, we would never learn anything.