To culture, good and bad are that cosmic conflict between the forces of righteousness and evil, while in nature, it's the basic biological binary of beneficial and detrimental, the 1/0 of sentience.

That's because the function of culture is to synchronize the group into a larger social organism, not harmonize it within the broader social and economic ecosystem.

The issues go to the dawn of Western Civ.

Remember democracy and republicanism originated in pantheistic cultures. Basically family as godhead.

To the Ancients, monotheism equated with monoculture. One people, one rule, one god.

The Romans co-opted a monotheistic sect as their state religion around the time the Empire solidified out of the ashes of the Republic. Basically validating the Big Guy Rules. When the West went back to more broad based political systems, it required the separation of church and state, essentially culture and civics.

The problem is that logically a spiritual absolute would be the essence of sentience, from which we rise, not an ideal of wisdom and judgement, from which we fell. More the light shining through the film, than what the images on it might be doing.

Ideals are not absolutes and an entire culture founded on the principle is inherently conflicted, as the multitudes of ideals can only fight until one is left standing, from Wahabism to wokism.

We are linear, goal seeking organisms in a cyclical, circular, reciprocal, feedback generated reality.

When marginalized groups and cultures find their particular grievances weaponized in a larger culture war, it's best to remember that what will suit them best is actual multiculturalism, not just replacing one form of monoculture with another. Or at least generating significant blowback from the more traditional and generally more stable form, often resulting in punishment to the marginal individuals.

Ask the Ukrainians, or the Afghanis, what it's like to have their grievances weaponized in some larger war.