You are quite welcome.

I suspect that if modern physics first developed in the East, where objects and context are interdependent, or in the South, where time is assumed to be circular and cyclical, rather than in the Western tradition, with its atomistic, object oriented focus, and the assumption the future is in front and the past behind us, because we see ourselves as discrete entities, moving through our context, it would be quite different than the current mathematical miasma.

Though the Western worldview does tend to be obsessive-compulsive, so it would be the first to think it can take everything apart, to try and understand it.

Except that when you reduce a body to its most stable elements, you have the skeleton, not the egg, making it difficult to explain emergence.

What if gravity is not so much a property of mass, as mass is an effect of this inward curvature, that encompasses all information formation, from where photons quantify out of the waving of the light. Then the excess gravitational effect isn't due to missing mass, but all that curvature further up the spectrum.

Energy goes to the future, expanding out to infinity, as information goes to the past, collapsing to equilibrium.